Hmm, how is it useful to you to know what damage type you are getting shot by? It's not like you can adjust your resistances on the fly... (at least unless you have carrier support)

Heat buildup (on the HUD) is like a pressure gauge and builds up clock-wise. Module damage (due to heat) is clock-wise. The new targeting/damage system is clock-wise. The odd one out will be the HUD itself, there damage is counter-clock-wise. Are there any other damage indicators?

Nice. The colours might need some tweaking for all the usual accessibility and stand-out-against-the-Amarr-nebula reasons, but it's simple and direct.

As you point out, though, the actual GÇ£correctGÇ¥ combination might vary with the weapon system so it's important to teach what you want for different weapons GÇö being within optimal with ACs is often, ironically enough, suboptimal.

Perhaps some of that could be solved by having two of them GÇö one for range and one for tracking GÇö but ugh, clutter. It would certainly be much neater if it could be done like you showed it.

Maybe add a block feature to the forums too, though that really should not be needed.

Yes, I'll agree with you there: rad/s is generally a better measurement since it's the same unit as the towers themselves use to measure their tracking ability. Transversal (usually measured in m/s) doesn't tell the full story and uses a completely different unit as well, so it's not nearly as handy for evaluating your turrets' chance to hit.